Contact Us Site Map

2000 Presidents Institute Resources

navigation - About CIC
navigation - Conferences and Events
navigation - Projects and Services
navigation - Tuition Exchange Program
navigation - For Presidents and CAOs
navigation - Making the Case
navigation - Publications


click for a printer friendly version

President Institute Resources

Presidential Spouse Reward Survey, Fall, 1999

  1. Salaries are becoming more important to those in the role of presidential spouse on independent college and university campuses. In 1994, the CIC Presidential Spouse Survey indicated that 24% of the respondents believed they should receive a salary for their work as presidential spouse. In 1999, the percentage rose to 37%.

  2. Yet the majority of presidential spouses, sixty three percent, do not feel they should receive a salary for serving as presidential spouse. They feel strongly that they prefer to serve as a volunteer for the institution; they see themselves as part of the presidential team, although they do not have a salary. And as they are unsalaried, they enjoy being able to say "no" occasionally when asked to help the university.

  3. The percentage of presidential spouses receiving a salary has risen from 11% in 1994 to 23 % in 1999, although there has been little change in the proportion of those with job descriptions. Five percent had a job description in 1994 and 6% in 1999. More presidential spouses also receive payment for their travel on behalf of the institution; 81% were reimbursed in 1994 compared with 89% today.

  4. Presidential spouses are less likely today to have their own career in addition to serving as presidential spouse. Fifty percent have a full or part-time career while 53% had careers in 1994.

  5. Spouses who are paid a presidential spouse salary are at institutions with significantly higher endowments per student than their colleagues who do not receive a presidential spouse salary. Endowments are slightly over $50,000 per student when presidential spouses receive a salary, compared to somewhat over $26,000 per student at institutions where spouses do not receive a salary.

  6. Among presidential spouses receiving salaries, their salaries do not increase with the size of the institution or with the per student endowment. There is not a significant correlation between reported presidential spouse salary level and either endowment per student or total enrollment. There was a trend, although not a statistically significant one, for those receiving presidential spouse salaries to come from larger institutions.

  7. Spouses who are paid a presidential spouse salary do not differ from their unpaid colleagues in having a career in addition to their work as a presidential spouse. They might also work full-time, part-time, or be self-employed. They are not significantly less likely to be employed outside the home.

  8. Spouses who are paid a presidential spouse salary are significantly more likely than other spouses to have their work acknowledged by the Board.

  9. Spouses who are paid a presidential spouse salary are significantly more likely than other spouses to:

  • have a formal job description as presidential spouse (although most who receive a presidential spouse salary do not have a formal job description)

  • think they should receive a salary for work as presidential spouse

  • receive financial rewards in general, including being significantly more likely to receive the following specific financial rewards:

    • contribution to own retirement fund

    • long term disability

    • short term disability

    • travel expenses paid when accompanying the president

    • conference fees paid

    • catering help

  1. Male presidential spouses were more likely than female spouses to have a career, (t (111) = 2.36, p < .05) and were less likely to engage in activities,( t (113) = 3.451, p < .005).

  2. Spouses who are paid a presidential spouse salary are significantly more likely than other spouses to engage in institutional activities in general, but the only specific activity they are significantly more likely to do is serve on committees.

  3. Presidential spouses who reported engaging in more activities also reported more sources of financial reward such as catering help, paid travel expenses, or secretarial assistance. Catering assistance remains about the same over the years; 86% of presidential spouses received such assistance in 1994 and 85% in 1999.

Note: Data from 119 surveys were analyzed. Eighty seven percent of those responding to the survey were women (100) and 13% were men (15). Frequencies recorded for each item reflect the number of respondents who answered that item, as do the percents recorded for each item.

item

yes

yes %

no

no %

Do you have a formal job description for your role as presidential spouse at your institution?

7

6%

109

94%

Are there any other college documents which interpret the role of the presidential spouse?

4

4%

96

96%

Do you receive any financial compensation explicitly for your work as a presidential spouse?*

27

23%

90

77%

Do you believe you should receive a salary for your work as presidential spouse?

42

37%

72

63%

*mean financial compensation reported: $13,885
median financial compensation reported: $10,000
range of financial compensation reported: $3,000-$54,000

Presidential spouses who feel they should not receive a salary for work as a presidential spouse gave the following mean ratings (1 = strongly disagree; 4 = neither agree nor disagree; 7 = strongly agree) to the following items:

item

mean

I prefer to serve as a volunteer for the college or university

5.7

I feel I already am part of the presidential team

5.7

I prefer to be able to say no occasionally when asked to help the institution

5.3

Receiving a salary would increase our taxes

4.4

Our institution could not afford to compensate the presidential spouse

3.9

I cannot devote a sufficient amount of time to the work of a presidential spouse to justify financial compensation

3.8

Note: 17 presidential spouses listed a variety of "other" reasons they thought they should not receive compensation as a presidential spouse.

Ways in which presidential spouses report they are financially rewarded by their institutions for their work as presidential spouses:

form of financial reward

yes

yes %

no

no %

Travel expenses paid when you accompany president on official business

105

89%

13

11%

Catering help is provided

100

85%

18

15%

Fees for attending conferences are paid*

89

75%

29

25%

Housekeeper is provided**

79

67%

39

33%

Health insurance is covered

52

44%

66

56%

Home computer is provided for you

29

25%

89

75%

Postage is paid

29

25%

89

75%

Secretarial assistance is provided for you***

26

22%

92

78%

Contribution to your own retirement fund

18

15%

100

85%

Health club membership is provided****

13

11%

105

89%

Home fax is provided for you

13

11%

105

89%

Life insurance is provided

12

10%

106

90%

Annual physical is provided

11

9%

107

91%

Car phone is provided for you

9

8%

109

92%

"Other"

9

8%

109

92%

Long term disability is provided

6

5%

112

95%

Car insurance is provided for you

5

4%

113

96%

Short term disability is provided

3

3%

115

98%

Office is provided for you as spouse

4

3%

114

97%

Car is provided for you

4

3%

114

97%

Baby sitting budget is provided*****

3

3%

114

97%

Housing allowance is provided for spouse who has a career in a city distant from the college

1

1%

117

99%

*Many indicated limits placed on number of conferences
**Many indicated limits on housekeeper hours of as low as two hours per week
***Many answering "yes" indicated assistance for only a few hours per week
****Includes a few country club memberships
*****Many indicated such care is not necessary

Non-financial ways in which presidential spouses indicated their institutions recognized their work:

form of non-financial recognition

yes

yes %

no

no %

Recognizing the presidential spouse at institutional functions

64

54%

54

46%

Acknowledging the work of the presidential spouse by the Board

41

35%

77

65%

Giving the presidential spouse an award

4

3%

114

97%

Naming something on campus after the presidential spouse

1

1%

117

99%

Receiving expressions of thanks from

board members

staff

campus administrators

faculty

students

"other"

74

72

71

66

65

9

64%

62%

61%

57%

56%

8%

42

44

45

50

51

106

36%

38%

39%

43%

44%

92%

Kinds of institutional activities in which presidential spouses reported they are engaged included:

institutional activity

yes

yes %

no

no %

Attending college events

118

100%

   
Entertaining at the presidential home

114

97%

4

3%

Hosting events on campus

105

89%

13

11%

Accompanying the president to visit alumni and other key constituents

105

89%

13

11%

Visiting donors to raise funds

88

75%

30

25%

Planning college or university events

85

72%

33

28%

Serving on community boards

81

69%

37

31%

Hosting campus visitors overnight in the presidential home

63

53%

55

47%

Serving on campus committees

58

49%

60

51%

Overseeing special projects

49

42%

69

59%

Giving speeches on or off campus

45

38%

73

62%

"Other"

26

22%

92

78%

Serving as a liaison to parents

24

20%

94

80%

 

item

yes

yes %

no

no %

Do you have your own career in addition to serving as presidential spouse?

(part-time position

full-time position)

58*

(34

22

50%

61%

39%)

58

50%

Are you self-employed?

16

14%

101

86%

* Two who answered "yes" did not indicate full- or part-time employment.

CIC appreciates the help of John Hull, Professor of Psychology at Bethany College (WV) who ran the statistical tests on the survey data as well as the work of the Spouses Task Force in developing the questionnaire. Task Force members are: Judy Shields, Rockford College, chair; Jan Carlberg, Gordon College; Stuart Showalter, Goshen College; Gemma Beckley, Rust College; Jeanette Cureton, Elmhurst College; and Emma Sloan, Miles College.

Mary Ann Rehnke
Vice President for Annual Programs
Council of Independent Colleges
mrehnke@cic.nche.edu
December 1999

back to top

Copyright ©1997-2008 Council of Independent Colleges. All rights reserved.