| |
|
| 
|
|
Institutions can make the case for their unique
attributes with the use of comparative alumni research, according
to a panelist at a Presidents Institute
session.
James
Day, principal, Hardwick Day Inc., a higher education research firm,
has conducted a number of alumni surveys forcolleges and universities
(affiliated with a particular denomination, within-a-state, faith-based,
and liberal arts institutions) that compare outcomes for students
from private and public institutions. The data from these surveys
effectively make the case for private institutions, Day said, particularly
given research which shows that “consumers today do not understand
the difference between public and private colleges,” and see little
difference between publics and privates on such indicators as “reputation
for excellence in major” or “good academic facilities.”
What’s
more, a survey of high school sophomores and juniors in four states
in fall 2002 showed that “regardless of GPA or income, a large number
of students won’t consider private colleges.” In Iowa, for example,
55 percent of students surveyed said that they would consider only
public universities, while 11 percent said they would consider only
privates.

However,
Hardwick Day’s Comparative Alumni Research Project shows big differences
in student outcomes and satisfaction levels between alumni from public
versus private colleges and universities. The research shows that
“the undergraduate experience students encounter at small, residential
liberal arts colleges is more effective in producing meaningful and
lasting benefits than the education experienced at large, public universities
and other institutions of higher education. These experiences include:
close interaction with peers and faculty, active participation in
learning, and participation in extracurricular activities,” Day said,
adding that “the survey indicates that a residential, liberal arts
education not only leads to a number of immediate positive outcomes,
but that these outcomes are present in and important to liberal arts
college alumni long after their college experience has ended.”
An alumni survey that Hardwick Day conducted for the Lutheran Educational
Conference of North America in fall 2002, for example, shows that
graduates of private colleges are more likely to be active, contributing
members in their communities (see chart) and they place a higher value
on community concerns than do graduates of flagship public universities.
Forty-five percent of Lutheran college respondents versus 28 percent
of flagship public respondents said that promoting racial equality
or other social justice issues was important; 41 percent private versus
26 percent public placed a higher value on contributing to the community;
and 27 percent versus 15 percent said that affiliating with organizations
that help the disadvantaged was important.
In
addition, private college alumni
(surveyed for a variety of groups) consistently
rated the following experiences much higher than alumni from public
institutions:
-
Had professors who challenged them, but personally helped them
meet the challenge (40% at top 50 national publics; 77-84% at
privates);
-
Had a majority of classes taught by professors rather than teaching
assistants (33% versus 84-91%); and
- Found
a mentor or role model (47% versus 79-85%).
Powerpoint
presentations on some of these studies can be found on the Hardwick
Day website at
www.itsacademic.com.
Independent
The Council of Independent Colleges
One Dupont Circle NW, Suite 320 • Washington, DC 20036
tel: (202) 466-7230 • Fax: (202) 466-7238 • e-mail: mailto:cic@cicnche.edu • www.cic.edu
Last updated: March 2003
Copyright © 2003 The Council of Independent Colleges |